.
Cinema/TV, Film Notes

Film review – Dream House

My notes on the 2011 film.

Even without discovering that director Jim Sheridan tried to have his name removed, this major studio spookshow gives off panic vibes – a trailer that spoils the mid-point twist of the film and renders it pointless if you know it going in.  It has a good (if barely stretched) cast, a reasonable (if overfamiliar) premise and one or two competent scares, but plods from one tame revelation to the next.  If it were a TV movie made in 1972, it might just have got away with it – but this comes at the end of so many similar items that you have to figure it’s an off-the-shelf script (screenwriter David Loucka’s last produced screenplay was Borderline, 2002 … his last modest hit was The Dream Team,1989) taken up by a director in need of a mainstream hit after a string of underperforming midlist items (Get Rich or Die Tryin, Brothers) have buried the memory of In the Name of the Father and My Left Foot.  It certainly feels like the usual syndrome when a director who thinks he’s better than the material tackles a horror movie – cf: Mike Nichols (Wolf), Neil Jordan (In Dreams), Mike Figgis (Cold Creek Manor).  I’d guess Sheridan hasn’t even seen the films Loucka borrows from: he sets about reinventing the wheel and delivers a pompous ripoff like someone who thinks a ghost story needs to be turned into a psychological drama to make it significant enough to be worth putting on the c.v.  It even has a generic title – half a dozen other films use it, all making more of the double meaning than this literalist fudge.

 

It opens with Manhattan publisher Will Atenton (Daniel Craig) – a name pronounced so stupidly it’s a tip-off that it’ll turn out to be a number 8-10-10 – leaving his job, bade farewell by friendly or creepy workmates, and moving with his wife Libby (Rachel Weisz) and two adorable daughters (Taylor and Claire Geare) into a suburban home so he can start work on a book.  Will discovers that their house is the site of a murder spree, when a husband seemingly killed his wife and daughters before being shot in the head … and the place is infested with pestering teenagers holding a séance, creepy loiterers and possible ghostly manifestations.  The police are typically unhelpful when he complains, a neighbour (Naomi Watts) knows more than she’s letting on, simmering bastards played by Marton Csokas (in the film’s worst performance) and Elias Koteas are plainly guilty of something and (as the trailer gives away) when Will visits the asylum where the supposed killer was until recently resident he’s told that he is the man, and that he only imagines his family are still alive.  All the cliches of the ‘imaginary friend’ movie are trotted out – the character who only talks to the protagonist, the fading of one reality (ideal home) into the truth (dilapidated wreck), the tritely unbelievable murder set-up, the premise-explaining shrink (Jane Alexander).  In the finale, it seems that the ghosts have independent existence, and Libby tries to distract the villains as they are menacing her living husband, but this comes out of left-field, and isn’t really addressed by the film.

Advertisements

Discussion

One thought on “Film review – Dream House

  1. Nigel Whitehead Darn it… I was quite looking forward to this film too… }:o(

    Paul Rowlands I feel bad for Dan Craig but,like The Invasion,at least he got to work with good actors and directors,and in the case of Dream House,find a new wife! Not all films can work.I’ll still check it out.Let’s hope TGWTDT will do well and be seen as a hit (Cowboys and Aliens was a hit that wasn’t seen as one).

    Rich Flannagan Anything featuring the lovely Rachel can’t be a total write-off but this doesn’t look far off.

    Stephen Bissette Saw it; agree with you, Kim. Game try; botched job.

    Haydn Watkins I was baffled they gave away the twist in the trailer too.

    Anne Billson Couldn’t agree more with our point about directors thinking they’re better than the material. They usually try to put some tired old psychological spin on it they imagine no film-makers or audiences before them have ever thought of before, eg the werewolf in Wolf = the beast in man! Well, fancy that.

    Anne Billson “your” point, not “our”.
    30 October 2011 at 17:10 · Like

    Pat Cadigan Hey, it’s ours now.:-)

    Posted by kimnewman | April 24, 2017, 8:17 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: